Assessing fluency is generally considered to be...

Assessing fluency is generally regarded as holistic because it involves evaluating a student's overall reading or speaking abilities rather than focusing solely on isolated skills. A holistic assessment captures a wide range of factors that contribute to fluency, such as expression, rhythm, phrasing, and comprehension, providing a comprehensive view of a learner’s proficiency.

In a holistic assessment approach, educators consider how these various aspects work together in context, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of a student's capabilities. This means that rather than breaking down fluency into discrete components, the assessment reflects the integrated nature of fluent reading or speaking, which is essential for effective communication.

The other options do not fit as well in this context. Quantitative assessments would focus on numerical data and specific metrics, which may not capture the full depth of fluency. Subjective assessments, while they can sometimes involve personal judgment, do not encompass the broader perspective that holistic assessments provide. Standardized assessments, on the other hand, follow set criteria that may limit their ability to evaluate fluency holistically.